The UMB Potential

IN A NUTSHELL

The idea to create a separate circuit for 1-2 shows is aimed to test some possible solutions to the points raised on the preceding page. The primary idea is to host a smaller show of up to around 20 bands (TBD based on interest and input) with the following structures in place:

• Start with the UMEA model

• Change divisions as follows***

  • • Zion Division: >151 Members

    • Bryce Division: 100-150 Members

    • Arches Division: 81-100 Members

    • Canyonlands Division: 61-80 Members

    • Captiol Reef Division: 41-60 Members

    • Antelope Division: <40 Members

***Bands may 'opt up' into any division above their default assignment

***Size figures may change depending on input received from this

• If more than 20 bands choose to participate, additional divisions may be created to more evenly divide into similarly sized groups. No more than 5 ensembles should compete in a single division.

• Judges will be drawn from adjacent states OR DOMESTICALLY so long as no relation to participating programs may be defined.

• Festival-Style rubrics will be drafted for Judge's use and provided to directors along with verbal feedback tapes

  • Rubrics will include subcategories as listed in existing adjudication sheets, but will be outlined in detail to mark specific evaluation points associated with ratings and score boundaries

• Judges will undergo a training session emphasizing objectivity in assessment- evaluating performances to a rubric rather than each other.

• Final scores and caption awards will be given as normal, with the potential for a fan-favorite award as well as sweepstakes.

• With smaller divisions and a smaller show, projected non-performer attendance is expected to be small enough to allow for bands to watch other performances from the front side.

• Venues will be chosen with the following elements in mind:

  • Front side seating capacity

  • Location in relation to participating groups (ideally central)

  • Parking/Unloading/Warmup Space Availability

• Ticket costs will be minimal and will only go toward the cost of putting on the event. Any overage will be split evenly across all participating programs. Profits made via concessions may go to the host organization.

• After each performance block, directors of participating groups will have a 20-minute window to meet with judges for additional feedback and recommendations in a station/rotation-based setting. Directors will have the opportunity to inquire about rubric markings, and judges will have an opportunity to further explain or recommend improvements to the show.

• Bands will receive point-based scores as well as festival-style ratings, similar to BOA.

• After all performances, the top 30%(ish) scoring bands will proceed to a Finals round to take place in the evening. (Exact number TBD subject to input)

• Any bands receiving a Superior Rating will receive a Plaque.

• Caption award and top 3 placement awards for each division will receive a trophy.

• All performances will be recorded from atop the box with sideline microphones and provided at no cost to each performing ensemble.

What do you think?

PLEASE give me feedback! 

Can I explain anything further? 

Is this something you feel would work? 

Can this theoretical model be improved? 

What concerns do you have? 

Is this worth pursuing? 

What potential consequences exist if we go down this route?

All inquiries, suggestions, general feedback, and insults are appreciated via email! Please reach out to umbcircuit@gmail.com.